Home About The Codist RSS Feed

We Are All Open Source Billionaires
Apr 25, 2007 08:20 perm link Readers: 1400

After reading Where Are All The Open source Billionaires, which made very good points, I thought to myself "we are all open source billionaires". This was echoed in some of the comments.

Yes, we don't have the money, but we gain the benefits of the work of thousands of folks toiling away on something they love and giving it free to the world. As a Java programmer I can build complex web applications and not spend a dime on anything (although I choose to use IntelliJ and Textmate). Same is true of PHP, Python, Perl, Ruby, LISP, Scheme, Smalltalk, etc.

The web probably wouldn't even exist without open source contributions like HTML, Apache, Linux, etc.

Imagine you had to pay for everything you use. Some companies refuse to consider anything they haven't paid a bundle for. I worked for such a company, and we wasted gazillions buying stuff on the assumption that it was of higher quality (dubious at best), had better support (too funny), and had a broad customer base so it must be well tested (so does internet porn). I'm not saying for pay software is necessarily better or worse; in many cases the ROI doesn't make much sense if you can get something similar for nothing, and you still have to spend the same money on development, infrastructure, interconnectivity. Does it make sense for most people to buy a $1,000,000 license for Oracle or use Postgres and spend the money on a better DBA staff? For some things Oracle is the only choice, but often people assume they need it just because it's Oracle.

Naturally the overwhelming choices in the open source world themselves can be a hindrance, and much of it is not useful or represents an extreme experiment not a usable tool. But the rapid evolution and even revolution that comes from the intense open source competition creates new development possibilities at an amazing rate. If all we had was Microsoft's ideas of invention, where would be the world be?

So consider yourself rich beyond compare that you live in a world where amazing software and tools can be had for less than a 99 cent song. It's a wealth that benefits everyone.

My Tags:

  • Shawn the Rock: Apr 26, 2007 04:07

    MS always dull our mind and killing our creativity.OpenSource is the only hope can beat MS in this battle.Think about MS's product like as MFC even .net framework,if we really get used to it then we would forget essential and what is funny things in programming.

  • Luis Ramirez: Apr 26, 2007 08:39

    The only reason for Microsoft getting cheaper, better because it does, .NET vs VB6 is a huge difference. And the reason, the competence, the same goes for Vista, even Leopard has copied stuff from Linux (Multiple desks, which is pretty cool) without Open Source, we would still be in Windows 95 or whatever. We all have benefit from Open Source, everyone, even the guy who buys every MS Op Sys on a regular basis, it would be a lot more expensive if it weren't for Open Source, he might never understand it, but who cares!.

    Yep, maybe there are no billionaires, but a lot of work has been around, working for a Company that supports that Open Source software (Novell, Red Hat, whatever) or starting up your own (Interface 21), what would have happened to them if they had gotten stucked with MS

    everyone benefits but not everybody promotes or support

  • Stephen: Apr 26, 2007 14:14

    It's not just software. There's also Project Gutenberg. I have an electronic library at my command. Not only that, my town also provides me with a library of dead trees (and movies and audio). And if they don't have it, i can ask for it via inter-library loan.

  • Add Comment

Name:


Optional URL:


Comment:


Save Cancel

Copyright © 2007 By Andrew Wulf